A health insurance claim denial can come as a shock, especially when the insurer’s explanation is that the treatment was “not medically necessary.” Patients often hear this phrase after a doctor has already recommended or provided care, leaving them confused about why coverage was refused.
A denial based on medical necessity does not always mean the insurance company is right. In many cases, these decisions are driven by internal coverage guidelines or cost-containment standards rather than the judgment of the treating physician. Understanding what the denial means, and what steps are available next, can help you determine whether to accept the insurer’s decision.
What Does “Not Medically Necessary” Mean in Health Insurance?
“Medical necessity” is a defined term within your health insurance policy or plan documents. Insurers use this definition to decide whether a service, procedure, or treatment qualifies for coverage. The exact wording can vary by provider.
Most health plan policies describe medically necessary care as treatment that is appropriate, effective, and consistent with accepted medical standards. However, insurers typically interpret these standards through their own internal medical policies, utilization review guidelines such as the Optum InterQual Criteria and/or Milliman Care Guidelines, or third-party reviewers. These guidelines may differ from the opinion of the patient’s physician.
As a result, a claim can be denied as not medically necessary even when:
- A licensed physician prescribed or recommended the treatment
- The treatment has already been performed
- The care aligns with prevailing medical practices
Because medical necessity is a contractual standard, disputes often come down to how the insurance company interprets the policy, not whether the care was reasonable from a medical standpoint.
Claim denials based on medical necessity are not isolated events. Denial rates vary widely by insurer, and some companies reject claims far more frequently than others.
Medical Necessity vs. Coverage Exclusions
A health insurance claim denied as being “not medically necessary” may not turn on medical necessity at all, but on whether the policy excludes the service.
Medical necessity and coverage exclusions are not the same thing. Medical necessity addresses whether a service meets the policy’s criteria for appropriate care, while exclusions define what types of services the policy does not cover at all, regardless of necessity.
In practice, insurers sometimes blur this distinction. A denial letter may state that a treatment was not medically necessary when the policy actually excludes the service, limits coverage by category, or imposes caps on visits, duration, or cost. This can affect how a denial should be challenged.
For example, a service may be:
- Medically appropriate but excluded by the policy
- Covered only under certain conditions that the insurer claims were not met
- Subject to limits that were not clearly disclosed or properly applied
Knowing whether a denial is based on medical necessity or a coverage exclusion matters because the strategy for appealing or disputing the decision can differ. Medical necessity disputes often focus on clinical justification and policy definitions, while exclusion-based denials may turn on contract interpretation and compliance with disclosure requirements.
How Insurers Evaluate Medical Necessity Claims
When a health insurance company reviews a claim for medical necessity, the decision is rarely made by the treating physician or based solely on the patient’s individual circumstances. Instead, insurers rely on internal review processes designed to apply standardized criteria across thousands of claims.
Most insurers use utilization review systems to evaluate whether a service meets their definition of medical necessity. These reviews may be conducted before treatment is provided (preauthorization) or after the fact, once a claim has already been submitted. In either case, the reviewer typically applies predetermined clinical guidelines rather than exercising independent medical judgment.
These guidelines may be developed by the insurance company itself or sourced from third-party vendors. While they are often described as evidence-based, they tend to be generalized and may not account for patient-specific factors such as prior treatment failures, coexisting conditions, or unique risks. As a result, a treatment that is appropriate for one patient may be denied for another based on how narrowly the criteria are applied.
Another important factor is that reviewers often do not have access to the full medical record. Decisions may be based on limited documentation, standardized coding, or brief summaries rather than detailed physician narratives. This can increase the likelihood of a denial when the medical justification for care is not immediately apparent from the claim submission alone.
In some cases, insurance companies rely on retrospective reviews to deny claims after treatment has already been provided. These reviews can be especially disruptive, as patients and providers may assume coverage exists until the denial arrives. Retrospective denials are frequently tied to allegations that the treatment exceeded what the insurer considers medically necessary in scope, duration, or intensity.
Understanding how insurers evaluate medical necessity helps explain why denials occur even when care was recommended by a qualified physician. It also underscores why successful appeals often require more than a simple request for reconsideration. Clear documentation, policy analysis, and an understanding of the criteria being applied can all play a role in challenging a denial.
Common Reasons Health Insurance Claims Are Denied as Not Medically Necessary
Health insurance claims may be denied for a variety of reasons tied to medical necessity. Some of the most common include:
- Treatment labeled as experimental or investigational, even when it is widely used in practice.
- Insurer claims a lower-cost alternative should have been tried first.
- Limits on frequency or duration of care, such as physical therapy or mental health treatment.
- Disputes over the setting of care, such as inpatient versus outpatient treatment.
- Retrospective reviews, where the insurer reassesses necessity after care has already been provided.
In many cases, these determinations rely on generalized guidelines that may not account for a patient’s individual medical history or condition.
What to Do Immediately After a Health Insurance Claim Is Denied
When a health insurance claim is denied as not medically necessary, timing and documentation matter. Before taking further action, it is important to understand exactly why your health insurance company denied coverage.
Key steps to take include:
- Carefully reviewing the denial letter and explanation of benefits
- Identifying the specific reason given for the denial
- Noting any deadlines for appealing the decision
- Requesting a copy of the insurer’s medical policy or criteria used to evaluate the claim
The denial letter should reference the policy provisions relied upon by the insurer. These provisions often become central to any appeal or dispute.
Understanding Your Right to Appeal a Denied Health Insurance Claim
If your claim is denied as not medically necessary, you still have options. Most plans provide the right to appeal a coverage decision, and state and federal laws often require insurers to offer multiple levels of review.
Appeals generally fall into two categories:
- Internal appeals, where the insurance company reconsiders its own decision, and
- External reviews, where an independent reviewer evaluates the denial.
During an appeal, policyholders may be allowed to submit additional information, such as:
- Letters from treating physicians explaining why the care was necessary
- Medical records supporting the diagnosis and treatment
- Clinical guidelines or peer-reviewed literature, when relevant
Strict deadlines usually apply, and missing them can limit available options. For this reason, many policyholders seek guidance before submitting an appeal, particularly when significant medical expenses or ongoing treatment are involved.
Why Deadlines and Procedures Matter in Health Insurance Appeals
Health insurance appeals are governed by strict procedural rules, and deadlines play a central role in determining whether a denied claim can be challenged. These requirements are typically set out in the insurance policy, plan documents, and applicable state or federal law.
Most health plans impose specific time limits for filing an appeal after a denial is issued. These appeal windows can be relatively short, and missing a deadline may result in the insurer treating the denial as final. In some cases, failing to appeal within the required timeframe can limit or eliminate further options for review.
Procedures matter just as much as timing. Insurance companies generally require appeals to be submitted in writing and supported by relevant documentation. Informal phone calls or conversations with customer service representatives may provide information, but they typically do not preserve appeal rights or extend deadlines. Even when an insurer appears to be reconsidering a decision informally, written confirmation is often necessary to ensure that rights are protected.
Maintaining clear records is also important. Keeping copies of denial letters, appeal submissions, medical documentation, and correspondence with the insurer can help clarify what information was provided and when. Written records may become especially important if a dispute continues beyond the internal appeal stage.
Because appeal requirements vary by plan and insurer, understanding the applicable procedures early can help avoid missteps. Taking a methodical approach to deadlines, documentation, and written submissions can reduce the risk of losing appeal rights based on technicalities rather than the merits of the claim.
Does It Matter Whether Your Health Plan Is Governed by ERISA?
Yes. Whether a health insurance plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) can significantly affect how a denied claim is handled and what options are available after an appeal.
Many employer-sponsored health plans are governed by ERISA, a federal law that establishes specific rules for claims administration, appeals, and litigation. Individually purchased plans and some government or church plans may fall outside ERISA and instead be governed by state insurance laws.
ERISA-governed plans often involve:
- Mandatory internal appeal procedures
- Strict deadlines for submitting appeals and evidence
- Limited opportunities to introduce new information after the appeal process ends
One key distinction is that, in ERISA cases, courts often review claim denials based solely on the administrative record created during the appeal process. This means that what is submitted during the appeal may determine the outcome later, making the appeal stage especially important.
Non-ERISA plans may allow broader remedies under state law, depending on the policy and jurisdiction.
When an Appeal Is Denied (and Why That’s Not Always the End)
Even after an appeal, a health insurance claim may still be denied. This is frustrating, but it does not always mean the insurer’s position is legally correct.
Internal appeals are still handled by the insurance company or its contractors, and external reviews may be limited in scope. In some cases, reviewers focus narrowly on clinical guidelines without fully addressing policy language or contractual obligations.
When an appeal is denied, additional options may still exist depending on:
- The terms of the insurance policy or plan
- Whether the plan is governed by ERISA or state law
- The nature and value of the denied claim
If you appeal a denied health insurance claim and receive another rejection, that decision may still be subject to further review depending on the policy and governing law.
Related Content
Just because your insurance company has rejected your claim or made an unreasonably low offer does not mean that it is the last word. You can fight back by retaining a dedicated insurance dispute lawyer. Wallace Law works hard to help clients better understand how insurance claims work so they can receive the payouts they deserve.
December 23, 2024
Health insurance companies can — and often do — deny claims. Luckily, consumers can challenge these denials. Wallace Law can guide you through the process.
July 10, 2023
Emotional distress, also called pain and suffering, can be challenging to measure in dollar figures. However, when your insurer fails to comply with its obligations and uses different strategies to stall a payout, you should be able to file an emotional distress lawsuit.
January 3, 2024
About 17 of every 100 healthcare claims are denied. Are you in this boat? Read more about your legal options here.
September 12, 2023
No matter what insurance provider you get your coverage through, there is always a chance that you will have to contend with denial. Familiarizing yourself with health insurance denial rates by company is part of the picture, but so is understanding how to push back against unjust claim denials.
April 18, 2025
When to Contact a Health Insurance Lawyer
Not every denied health insurance claim requires legal involvement. However, there are situations where speaking with a health insurance dispute lawyer can be helpful before accepting a denial or pursuing further appeals.
This may include cases involving:
- High-cost or long-term medical treatment
- Repeated denials based on the same rationale
- Complex or ambiguous policy language
- Employer-sponsored or ERISA-governed plans
- Situations where appeals have already been denied
A lawyer can review the policy, assess whether the insurance company followed required procedures, and evaluate whether the denial is consistent with the terms of coverage.
How Wallace Insurance Law Helps With Denied Health Insurance Claims
Wallace Insurance Law represents policyholders in disputes with insurance companies, including cases involving health insurance claim denials. The firm’s work focuses on analyzing insurance policies, evaluating denial decisions, and advising clients on available remedies.
This may involve:
- Reviewing policy language and plan documents
- Assessing compliance with appeal and review requirements
- Identifying contractual or statutory issues affecting coverage
- Pursuing appropriate remedies when insurers fail to honor their obligations
Each claim is evaluated based on its specific facts and governing policy terms.
Know Your Rights Before Accepting a “Not Medically Necessary” Denial
Seeing the words “claim denied as not medically necessary” within an official insurance document can feel final, but these decisions are often subject to challenge. Insurance companies rely on policy definitions and internal standards that may not reflect the full medical picture or the contractual obligations owed to policyholders.
Understanding the reason for the denial, the appeal process, and the legal framework governing the policy can make a meaningful difference. Before assuming that coverage is unavailable, it is worth reviewing the denial carefully and considering whether additional steps are available.
If you have questions about a denied health insurance claim, Wallace Insurance Law can help evaluate your situation and explain your options. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Get Started Right Now
Contact our team for help
